Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Tso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Tso

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:JOURNALIST. Sources provided and most of the limited gnews hits are from her employer CNBC. LibStar (talk) 04:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 04:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Searches of NewsBank and WikiLibrary returned several results but nothing I could find that establish her notability per WP:JOURNALIST. Because she's a reporter there's a lot of results but mostly it's articles by her, rather than about her, and of those, nothing substantive that I could find. Cabrils (talk) 00:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Highly prominent journalist in the Asia Pacific region with an article since 2006. That should speak volumes about the long-standing significance of her in Wikipedia. Evaluating the notability of journalists using WP:RS needs to be handled with care, as journalists by policy tend not to make themselves the center of reporting, so one cannot expect coverage of them on the same scale as, say, a business leader or actor. - Fuzheado | Talk 02:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any sources to back your argument? The fact that the article existed since 2006 has zero bearing on notability. LibStar (talk) 04:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: MuckRack, her employer's bio and various pieces she's written or reported, none of which help notability. I can't find independent sourcing about this person. Oaktree b (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:AUTHOR, no reliable sources that distinguish the criteria for WP:GNG. "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject". The article cites no independent sources and instead are all from their employer. Noorullah (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.